This week at Retraction Watch featured nine more fake peer review retractions, this time from Elsevier, and an update to the retraction count for one-time record holder Joachim Boldt. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: A statistician smackdown: “Methodological and Reporting Errors in Meta-Analytic Reviews Make Other Meta-Analysts Angry.” (sub req’d) Despite known problems, many biomedical […]
The post Weekend reads: Angry meta-analysts; imposter cell lines; when things go wrong appeared first on Retraction Watch.
